Gang Prevention

Visit – www.RichardRRamos.com

Archive for September, 2007

Gang Banger in the Classroom – Principle # 7 – Priorities

Posted by gangprevention on September 26, 2007

The problem of “pettiness”

 Of the seven issues I have discussed here, this is one of the most common and emotionally exhausting mistakes a teacher can fall into, and while student gang members can respect rules, they resent pettiness, recognize it readily, and usually react very negatively to it.  In general I think most of us also resent pettiness when we encounter it in our daily lives.  For example, I remember getting “swatted” with the paddle in Junior High School for allowing my shirt tail to hang outside of my pants!  Can you imagine such a rule in today’s school environment?  Was that really important?  Did this rule really teach me something about character or improve my self-image?  What was the underlying principle or concern that was going on with that?  In other words, what was the thing, or root cause of the rule and could there not be a better rule to develop whatever the school was trying to develop in its students.  Well you may agree or disagree, but it was enforced with consistency and rigor on mine and others behinds.  The funny thing was that it was only my friends and others of our ethnicity that seemed to dress with that particular style, most others tucked there shirts in. 

 I realize that even today some schools do have a dress code, but this usually has to do with trying to keep the gang dress and colors off the school campus, or trying to keep enough clothes on girls to avoid too much attention from male students and faculty alike.  I also remember that the Girls Vice-Principle would stand in the hall way and pick out girls wearing skirts above the knee and would literally pull out a ruler and measure how high above the knee the skirt was right in front of everyone else!.  If it exceeded the “legal length” (Which I don’t remember what it was but it was not very high), the girl would be sent home to change.  Or how about the police officer who pulls you over at two o’clock in the morning for “rolling” through a stop sign (lovingly referred to as “the California roll”, as one cop put it and I had hoped he was talking about sushi, but he wasn’t) when there is nobody else in sight for miles and instead of warning you, actually writes you a ticket!   I am sure many of you reading this could tell your own stories of frustrating “pettiness” at school, the Bank, grocery store, with your Landlord, your insurance company, telephone bill, light bill, gas bill, neighbors, church, boss and co-workers, etc. 

 In the case of the classroom, pettiness can be in the form of getting penalized for arriving seconds after the tardy bell rings, not having a pencil or your book, or some other infraction of a whole bunch of rules the teacher has listed.  I realize that the examples I have given here may not seem “petty” to some, but the point is the fact that schools and teachers can be petty and I suggest this only leads to emotional and physical energy that could be better spent in other things than trying to play “gotcha” because of all the rules in place that set students up for failure. 

 Of course the question is what defines pettiness?  Here is Webster’s definition: insignificant; trivial; narrow-minded; or mean.”  Thus, however the teacher decides to define what rules are petty or not, I suggest the teacher make every effort to avoid falling into the daily “cat and mouse” game that pettiness invites and that some students love to play.

 To avoid this emotional time trap, the teacher must decide what is important, what their priorities are, based on principle, rather than subjective “pet peeves” when it comes to classroom culture and the rules of conduct.   Much like parents, we must choose our battles carefully, lest we be drawn into and “die on the wrong battlefield”.  We must know where we will draw the “line in the sand” and when that line is crossed we will take action for the long term good of the whole class and to demand the respect we have earned.  This takes discussion, decisiveness and discernment all of which is gained through years of experience.  A general rule of thumb is that too many rules, too many policies, and too much “zero tolerance” only begs for petty enforcement rather than discretion that allows for the solutions of student buy in, positive motivation and a transition to transforming cooperation.

 One idea to avoid being petty, or being perceived as being petty, is when at all possible to include the students in designing the class rules and the punishment for breaking “their” rules.  Maybe a focus group can be formed that is represented by one student from each period/class.  I know that this may not work or be possible in all circumstances, but it does work in some situations and it is understood that the rules and consequences are not in stone and can be reviewed and revised when necessary.  By the way, this is a good way of teaching kids the basics of how our laws are made and ratified in civic life and the role of citizens in the process.  Another tool for the teacher who has kids is to ask their own kids to evaluate their classroom rules or discuss with them situations they came across and what they did about it.  Youth have a keen sense and intuition of pettiness that we adults seem to lose the older we get.  This does not mean that they are always right or that we have to follow their advice all the time, but sometimes they are right and following their advice can work for you. 

 There is no question that emotional energy is needed in the classroom and most teachers are “spent” or empty at the end of each day as they work through all the preparation of lessons, instruction and dealing with the daily drama from period to period, let alone the drama with other teachers, the administration, parents and possibly their own personal life.  Thus, the last thing a teacher needs is to “spend” or waste their time on the “small” issues, rather than “investing” their time in the “larger” issues of educating children.  If one is not careful to examine their assumptions and objectively evaluate their classroom culture, pettiness can rule the day and steal the joy, satisfaction and significance of teaching.

    

Posted in General, Leadership, Teachers | Leave a Comment »

Gang Banger in the Classroom – Principle # 6 – Meekness

Posted by gangprevention on September 14, 2007

Allowing disrespect and intimidation

 Fear and intimidation can be a powerful tool in the hand of a student gang member.  It is something the teacher must do their best never to give into.  If a student is using the tactic of intimidation on the teacher and perceives that the teacher is afraid, it will be considered a sign of weakness and it can result in a tough battle to earn the upper hand of respect and control of the classroom.  This of course is the objective of intimidation and fear, but in a classroom situation the teacher can often overcome this through the power of meekness.   

This may at first seem like a response of weakness in itself and certainly there are times when a teacher will have to assert themselves in a forceful and firm manner in order to take control or use fear and intimidation themselves when the situation calls for it.  But in general, meekness can be a better way of winning the war over the long haul, even though one may seemingly lose the current battle.  I am not suggesting that the teacher in an intimidating situation won’t feel the emotion of fear or even show that they are somewhat afraid.  But this display of outward emotion does not mean we are not willing to confront the situation and stay in the battle for control, respect and compliance of the disruptive student to the same standards of conduct and productivity expected of everyone else.  For example, if a student threatens or physically gets in the face of the teacher, and is obviously bigger and stronger or believed to be capable of causing harm, at that moment, a teacher may feel scared, look scared and in fact be intimidated and back down in that moment.  However, what let’s the student know that they have only won one battle and that the war itself is not over, is that the teacher will still dole out the consequences for their behavior, expect whatever it was that they wanted to be done or not done, to still be obeyed, and they will continue on with the lesson or whatever was taking place at the time for the benefit of the rest of the class.   

Believe me, if a teacher can manage this, it will be a major deposit in the hearts of the other students and gain her a lot of respect and cooperation from the others, and some will even come to her defense in the moment or later on. In other words we are showing the student(s) gang member that we will not be intimidated or fearful to hold them accountable, nor will we allow them to dictate to us, and make us make them our “enemy” for that would be playing right into their hand.  We are beyond that.  We will not be bullied into always kicking them out of class and sending them to the Vice Principals office, though that may be what they deserve, we are in control and may choose not to give them what they deserve!  We are not afraid to forgive, understand, turn the other cheek and demonstrate “power under control”, which is the true definition of “meekness”.   

Choosing to respond with the principle of meekness is not a sign of “weakness”, but rather it is a sign of true power in the stronger (whether it be physically, intellectually, authoritatively or morally) position, choosing not to exercise our power at the moment for their sakes.  I can not count all the times I have chosen this response in situations where I clearly had the upper hand when being challenged physically, mentally or emotionally by students, gang members and my own children as a father disciplining my children.   Allow me to share one more story to illustrate the power of meekness in dealing with tough situations, especially when we are trying to win over our “enemies” so to speak. 

While I was a pastor I had a member who was a heavy duty drug user and seller and had done a lot of time in prison.  I built what I thought was a good relationship with this person and went out of my way many times for him in a variety of ways as his pastor.  At one point he began to make demands on me that I just could not accept, nor would do.  He then began to intimidate me with death threats and violence that he and his brothers would do against me, my wife and kids. Had I not thought he was capable of such actions I might have blown it off, but I knew he and his brothers were very capable and I lost several nights of sleep over it as “tonight” always became the night he was going to carry out the threats.  Some of you are probably wondering why I did not call the police, and maybe I should have, but having worked in the prison and understanding his mentality of “fingering” or “ratting” him out, I just did not think that was the right course of action to solve this real threat.  Finally, one night after another threatening call, I was so fed up with his threats that I hung up and decided to take him by surprise and showed up at his house.  One of his brothers answered the door and let me in.  He (my “friend”) was shocked to see me and I calmly began to tell him that this had to end.  He immediately starting cursing at me and then slapped me across the face.  Now, in my mind I clearly had the upper hand physically and by the fact that he was high on whatever and I wasn’t.  However, when his brother saw my non-reaction of turning the other cheek, he immediately stepped in and pulled him away from me and told me to leave, which I did but not before I made it clear that I was not going to tolerate this anymore (I didn’t know what I was going to do, but I said it anyway).  The following day, this guy felt so bad about hitting me and just the fact that I did not retaliate when he knew I clearly could have as I had caught him and his brother high and off guard, that he came to the church and literally got on his knees and crying asked me to forgive him, which I did and the problem never surfaced again and his loyalty to our relationship was the stronger for it.   

This is obviously a very extreme example and to be sure, I certainly would never recommend to anybody to take the course of action I did, but I only share it to drive home the point of the power of the principle of meekness and forgiveness to someone opposing you.   I am sure there are teachers, principals, policemen, pastors and parents reading this, who could share similar stories about the power of demonstrating meekness as one response to fear and intimidation, and while it may not always work, or may not always be what we are able to decide to do, it does work as a matter of principle over time.  Thus, sometimes we have to fight fire with fire, and sometimes we have to fight fire with water, but we never want to fight fire with gasoline, which is too often the case when teachers and students clash in the classroom and things only get worse for all concerned when anger rules as the weapon of choice.  The balance between meekness and weakness is that on the one hand I choose to keep my power under control, but on the other hand I refuse to accept being disrespected and will not give in to intimidation in my home, school or classroom. 

Posted in Leadership, Teachers | Leave a Comment »

Ramos September Guest Panelist at two Washington D.C. Conferences

Posted by gangprevention on September 7, 2007

1. – September 14, 2007 Coordinating Council meeting to be held at the Department of Labor, Washington D.C.   

11:30 – 12:00  

Engaging with the Faith Community: Urban Ministries, Capacity Building and Opportunities for Federal Collaboration                                    

Moderator:  J. Robert Flores, Vice Chair, Coordinating Council                                      

Panelists:    

Mentoring Children of Prisoners – Wilson Goode                                   

Leadership Foundation – Reid Carpenter                                   

Latino Coalition – Richard Ramos

2.  – WHITE HOUSE FAITH-BASED AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVES
CONFERENCE ON YOUTH AND EDUCATION IN THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY

Washington, DC – September 24, 2007  – Identifying Government Funding Opportunities (2:15 – 3:20)

  1. Programs that Impact Youth Offenders DOL/DOJ

Programs that Impact Youth Offenders 
In this workshop, organizations will learn how a variety of grant programs designed to impact young people who have been involved in the criminal justice system. Participants will learn about grant programs at the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Labor and will hear directly from grantees who are using federal funding and private funding for programs that are changing the lives of young people in their community, providing opportunity and hope. 


Moderator:      Scott Shortenhaus
Presenters:      Richard Ramos, Latino Coalition
                            Gregg Weltz, Department of Labor
                            Robert Flores, Department of Justice

Conference details

http://www.dtiassociates.com/fbci/logisticsDC.cfm?location=DC

Posted in Events, In the News | Leave a Comment »

Gang Banger in the Classroom – Principal # 5 – Poise

Posted by gangprevention on September 3, 2007

Taking ourselves too seriously

“Self command is the main elegance”- Ralph Waldo Emerson 

One of the greatest lessons I learned while serving as a correctional officer in two prisons was not to take myself too seriously or I would become the target of the inmates’ daily game of seeing whose “buttons” they could push to cause an officer to lose emotional control, or their “professional poise” in one way or another.  It became a game, a bet, to see how long it would take to cause the officer to explode with anger.  The inmates hardly ever meant much of what they said, and did not care that much about the stuff they did, it was all about pushing buttons and just good entertainment for people in their daily situation.  Working in this type of environment is like a daily “psychological war” game and it can cause you a lot of frustration and anger, and begin to cause you to come to work with a vendetta to get back at the person, or people for exploiting your emotions like this on a regular basis.   One crude, but poignant example of this is the lesson all correctional officers learn about answering their house floor phone and that is that you never answer that phone without looking at the receiver first!  Why?, because one of the “games” inmates like to play is with the phone receiver because it rings all day and night as officers communicate back and forth from different parts of the prison and they pick up the phone quickly and put it to their ear and talk, etc.  However, what inmates like to do from time to time for a laugh, is to sneak and smear human excrement on the receiver and when the office picks up the phone without looking at it first and puts it to their ear, well, you can imagine the rest.   I remember seeing this happen to a woman officer one day that the inmates did not particularly like and what a scene that was!  To this day I still never answer any phone without looking at it first!  Thus, while in this example, I would have lost my poise as did my colleague that day, the point is that what made her the target of such a crass prank was that she was one that took herself too seriously (for the inmates anyway), and they wanted to find a way to push her buttons. 

In general, it follows that if those of us in leadership or positions of authority, working in a high risk environment begin to take ourselves too seriously, it can cause us to become a target to those who love to provoke you out of your comfort zone.   My staff and I used to fight this psychological war everyday at the Teen Center also where I was the Director (as I referred to earlier in the book).  The kids would love to do this “button pushing”, as I call it, as a kind of soft way of rebelling or defying authority from a place where the provoker is relatively on safe ground since he or she is really not doing anything too serious other than just playing with your mind too see how far they can go and learn what makes you tick and where your anger buttons are, etc. And believe me, most of the time, it is a planned event and the “innocent” by-standers are usually part of the plot and have talked the one provoker into the act that they all believe will get the desired result of anger that they can all laugh at later. 

After dealing with this in the prisons, school campuses and at the Teen Center, I learned that it doesn’t hurt to lighten up, loosen up and be able to laugh at yourself once in awhile and not be so serious 100% of the time even though you might be in a tough daily environment like a Teen Center working with at-risk youth or a classroom with student gang members who love to push your buttons.   I remember back in Junior High School a few of my friends and I decided to give a “pay back” to our teacher as she always seemed to be “picking” on one of us (Of course the truth is we were always disrupting the class).  On this particular day, I was chosen to be the “provoker” by placing a thumb tack on the stool she always sat on when she was addressing the class.  The excitement and anticipation for those of us in “the know” was just too much fun and things got out of hand when the climatic moment came and she sat on her stool only to jump right back out of it with an awkwardness and disfigured face that none of us could maintain our poise to and we were somehow implicated as having something to do with it?  I am sure you get “the point” (pun intended) by this story and what I am discussing here, that when we take ourselves too seriously and don’t seem to possess the ability to have a little levity in our learning environment (which this teacher clearly did not have) sometimes others will take it into their own hands to break the monotonous monotone of seriousness.   One thing about us “Latinos/Chicanos” is that we love to “cap” (slang for making fun of) and play “practical jokes” and if a teacher has a room full of us she can expect that a lot of capping and practical jokes will take place. If she can learn to “take it”, or better yet, learn how to “cap” back, without crossing the line, it goes a long way with Latino students in developing rapport, respect and receptiveness of instruction. 

The wise thing to do when one finds themselves the victim of “capping” is to respond with poise and laughter, or at least a smile (Not in the case of the thumb tack incident of course, that went way beyond capping), which will signal to the one capping (and everyone else watching) that you can “take it”.  Believe it or not, with most Latino youths, this goes a long way in building rapport and earning their respect, especially if you are quick witted and know how to “come back” in a way that makes the others go, “ooohhhhhh” and make the person who capped on you laugh while their face turns red!  Having “poise” or practicing the principle of poise was not something we learned in “teachers’ school”.  However, as we know, our education did not end when we graduated but really began the day we entered the real world of the daily class room and developing poise is a skill we need and can still acquire.  Thus, I suggest that understanding and learning to develop our poise will help us encounter and overcome some of the daily battles we will most likely encounter in working with “at-risk” or defiant and disobedient youth.   

The word poise is defined as; a counterweight, regulating power, balance, equilibrium, self-possession and composure.  It is a kind of inner tranquility, that some have suggested is one of the best ways to manifest one’s true power and authority or command of the situation.  This is important to understand because while the class room is ideally a place of learning, it is often a place of a subtle and sometimes not so subtle battle for control and power.  And thus, the teacher needs a strategy that will produce a win for them and a win for the students.  Thinking “win-win” is vital on the “psychological battlefield” because if all we concern ourselves with is winning for ourselves, we can miss the other opportunity that exists which is the conversion of our “competition” while at the same time establishing our control and power in the class room.   

How is this done?  One way is through the exercising of our poise as a “counterweight” or balance to the disruptive, rude and defiant behavior meant to intimidate us and render us powerless as an authority figure in our own domain.  As I stated, this is a battle that must be won by the teacher, yet, there is more to winning than just squelching and defeating your competition, which is within the power of the teacher to do and usually the instinctive reaction of power in the classroom.  I suggest that a choice to respond with tranquility and poise during times of being the subject of laughter is a powerful demonstration of control and power that can not only give others a sense of security and peacefulness, but also serve to win over their hearts as they witness a better way of handling disrespect, discourteousness and discomfort. 

 “Remember that there is always a limit to self-indulgence, but none to self-restraint.”-         Mahatma Gandhi 

Posted in General, Leadership, Teachers | Leave a Comment »